Login / Signup

Recommendations on compiling test datasets for evaluating artificial intelligence solutions in pathology.

André HomeyerChristian GeißlerLars Ole SchwenFalk ZakrzewskiTheodore EvansKlaus StrohmengerMax WestphalRoman David BülowMichaela KarglAray KarjauvIsidre Munné-BertranCarl Orge RetzlaffAdrià Romero-LópezTomasz SołtysińskiMarkus PlassRita CarvalhoPeter SteinbachYu-Chia LanNassim BouteldjaDavid HaberMateo Rojas-CarullaAlireza Vafaei SadrMatthias KraftDaniel KrügerRutger FickTobias LangPeter BoorHeimo MüllerPeter HufnaglNorman Zerbe
Published in: Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc (2022)
Artificial intelligence (AI) solutions that automatically extract information from digital histology images have shown great promise for improving pathological diagnosis. Prior to routine use, it is important to evaluate their predictive performance and obtain regulatory approval. This assessment requires appropriate test datasets. However, compiling such datasets is challenging and specific recommendations are missing. A committee of various stakeholders, including commercial AI developers, pathologists, and researchers, discussed key aspects and conducted extensive literature reviews on test datasets in pathology. Here, we summarize the results and derive general recommendations on compiling test datasets. We address several questions: Which and how many images are needed? How to deal with low-prevalence subsets? How can potential bias be detected? How should datasets be reported? What are the regulatory requirements in different countries? The recommendations are intended to help AI developers demonstrate the utility of their products and to help pathologists and regulatory agencies verify reported performance measures. Further research is needed to formulate criteria for sufficiently representative test datasets so that AI solutions can operate with less user intervention and better support diagnostic workflows in the future.
Keyphrases
  • artificial intelligence
  • deep learning
  • big data
  • machine learning
  • rna seq
  • clinical practice
  • convolutional neural network
  • randomized controlled trial
  • transcription factor
  • healthcare
  • oxidative stress