Login / Signup

Design characteristics, risk of bias, and reporting of randomised controlled trials supporting approvals of cancer drugs by European Medicines Agency, 2014-16: cross sectional analysis.

Huseyin NaciCourtney DavisJelena SavovićJulian P T HigginsJonathan A C SterneBishal GyawaliXochitl Romo-SandovalNicola HandleyChristopher M Booth
Published in: BMJ (Clinical research ed.) (2019)
Most pivotal studies forming the basis of EMA approval of new cancer drugs between 2014 and 2016 were randomised controlled trials. However, almost half of these were judged to be at high risk of bias based on their design, conduct, or analysis, some of which might be unavoidable because of the complexity of cancer trials. Regulatory documents and the scientific literature had gaps in their reporting. Journal publications did not acknowledge the key limitations of the available evidence identified in regulatory documents.
Keyphrases
  • papillary thyroid
  • squamous cell
  • cross sectional
  • transcription factor
  • systematic review
  • lymph node metastasis
  • emergency department
  • young adults