Patients' and oncologists' preferences for second-line maintenance PARP inhibitor therapy in epithelial ovarian cancer.
Rebecca L StoneM Janelle Cambron-MellottKathleen BeusterienMartine C MaculaitisStephanie RitzEmily MulvihillMatthew MonbergElizabeth A SzamretaSuvina AminKimmie McLaurinPublished in: Future oncology (London, England) (2021)
Aim: To understand the preferences of US patients and oncologists for PARP inhibitors as second-line maintenance (2LM) for epithelial ovarian cancer. Methods: A discrete choice experiment was conducted to assess the preferences of treatment attributes. Results: The most valued attributes were risk of grade 3/4 AEs (patients, n = 204) and PFS (oncologists, n = 151). To accept a 37% increased risk of grade 3/4 AEs, PFS would need to increase by 27.9 months (patients) and 6.3 months (oncologists). The least valued attributes were dosing form/frequency (patients) and grade 3/4 anemia risk (oncologists). Conclusion: Patients' and oncologists' willingness to make benefit-risk trade-offs in the 2LM setting suggests that the PFS gains observed in selected studies of poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPis) in BRCA-mutated disease are worth the toxicity risk.