Does the purpose matter? A comparison of everyday information and communication technologies between eHealth use and general use as perceived by older adults with cognitive impairment.
Elin JakobssonLouise NygårdAnders KottorpCecilia Bråkenhielm OlssonCamilla W MalinowskyPublished in: Disability and rehabilitation. Assistive technology (2020)
In this sample, all EICTs were perceived as having lower relevance for eHealth use compared to general use, suggesting that the purpose of using an EICT affects the perceived relevance of it. Also, once an EICT is perceived as relevant and used for eHealth purposes, there seem to be little to no differences in perceived challenge compared to the same EICT used for general purposes.Implications for rehabilitationAll stakeholders, including health care providers, need to be aware of the hindrances that come with digitalization, making it challenging to many citizens to make use of digital solutions.It is of great importance that social services including eHealth services be tailored to suit the individual/target group.Older adults may need support and an introduction to EICTs to discover the potential relevance of the specific device and/or service.