Investigating the Associations between Patient-Reported Quality of Care and Perceived Coercion: A Norwegian Cross-Sectional Study.
Siri Ødegaard FossumØyfrid Larsen MoenMarianne Thorsen GonzalezAgneta SchröderHege Skundberg-KletthagenPublished in: Issues in mental health nursing (2024)
Patient perspectives on the quality of care received are fundamental to mental health care. This study aimed to investigate the association between patient-reported mental health care quality, perceived coercion, and various demographic, clinical, and ward-related factors. Using a cross-sectional design, data were collected from 169 patients in Norwegian mental health wards using the quality in psychiatric care-inpatient (QPC-IP) instrument and experienced coercion scale (ECS). The analysis revealed a consistent pattern in which patients with higher perceived coercion consistently rated lower quality on all QPC-IP dimensions. The significant findings of the multiple regression models further supported this association. Beyond coercion, the factors influencing quality ratings include self-reported treatment results, participation in treatment planning, and knowledge of complaint procedures. Emphasizing the pivotal role of coercion in enhancing mental health care quality, these findings contribute to a nuanced understanding of patient experiences and underscore the importance of patient participation in mental health care improvement efforts.
Keyphrases
- mental health
- quality improvement
- patient reported
- healthcare
- palliative care
- physical activity
- depressive symptoms
- case report
- end stage renal disease
- social support
- ejection fraction
- newly diagnosed
- patient reported outcomes
- chronic kidney disease
- peritoneal dialysis
- artificial intelligence
- deep learning
- health insurance