Burst gap code predictions for tactile frequency are valid across the range of perceived frequencies attributed to two distinct tactile channels.
Kevin K W NgIan N SnowIngvars BirznieksRichard M VickeryPublished in: Journal of neurophysiology (2021)
Perceived frequency of vibrotactile stimuli can be divided into two distinctive cutaneous sensations-flutter (<60 Hz) and vibratory hum (>60 Hz), mediated by two different tactile afferent types [fast adapting type I (FA1) and fast adapting type II (FA2), respectively]. We recently demonstrated a novel form of neural coding in the human tactile system, where frequency perception of stimulus pulses grouped into periodic bursts in the flutter range depended on the duration of the silent gap between bursts, rather than the periodicity or mean impulse rate. Here, we investigated whether this interburst interval could also explain the perceived frequency of electrocutaneous pulse patterns delivered at frequencies above the flutter range. At stimulus rates of 50 to 190 pulses/s, the burst gap model correctly predicted the perceived frequency. This shows that the burst gap code represents a general coding strategy that spans the range of frequencies traditionally attributed to two different tactile channels.NEW & NOTEWORTHY We present evidence for a generalized frequency processing strategy on tactile afferent inputs that is shared across a broad range of frequencies extending beyond the flutter range, supporting the notion that spike timing has an important role in shaping tactile perception.