Login / Signup

Perceived vulnerability to infectious disease and perceived harmfulness are as predictive of citizen response to COVID-19 as partisanship.

Abigail Cassario
Published in: Politics and the life sciences : the journal of the Association for Politics and the Life Sciences (2023)
Partisans have biased perceptions of objective conditions. At first glance, the COVID-19 pandemic would appear to be an example of this phenomenon. Noting that most citizens have consistently agreed about the pandemic, I argue that we have overlooked pre-political factors that are as influential as partisanship in shaping citizens' responses to the pandemic. I identify one such construct in perceived vulnerability to infectious disease (PVD). In one cross-sectional study and one panel study, I find that the influence of PVD on citizens' perceptions of COVID-19 equals that of partisanship. I also find that PVD can moderate the influence of partisanship on perceptions of harmfulness, nearly erasing the impact of being a Republican on perceiving COVID-19 as a threat. When led by PVD as well as partisanship to accurately perceive harm, citizens, including Republicans, attribute more responsibility to former president Donald Trump for his failed handling of the crisis.
Keyphrases
  • coronavirus disease
  • infectious diseases
  • sars cov
  • social support
  • healthcare
  • depressive symptoms
  • primary care
  • physical activity
  • respiratory syndrome coronavirus
  • mental health
  • climate change
  • public health