PRO: Carbapenems should be used for ALL infections caused by ceftriaxone-resistant Enterobacterales.
David L PatersonBurcu IslerPatrick N A HarrisPublished in: JAC-antimicrobial resistance (2021)
Ceftriaxone resistance in the Enterobacterales is typically the result of production of ESBLs or AmpC β-lactamases. The genes encoding these enzymes are often co-located with other antibiotic resistance genes leading to resistance to aminoglycosides, quinolones and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole. Carbapenems are stable to ESBLs and AmpC giving them reliable in vitro activity against producers of these β-lactamases. In contrast, piperacillin/tazobactam and amoxicillin/clavulanate are compromised by co-production of OXA-1, which is not inhibited by tazobactam or clavulanate. These in vitro findings provide an explanation for the MERINO trial outcomes, where 3.7% (7/191) randomized to meropenem died compared with 12.3% (23/187) randomized to piperacillin/tazobactam as definitive treatment of bloodstream infection due to ceftriaxone-resistant organisms. No randomized trials have yet put cefepime and carbapenems head to head, but some observational studies have shown worse outcomes with cefepime. We argue that carbapenems are the antibiotics of choice for ceftriaxone-resistant Enterobacterales.
Keyphrases
- gram negative
- antibiotic resistance genes
- phase iii
- multidrug resistant
- phase ii
- double blind
- open label
- placebo controlled
- microbial community
- wastewater treatment
- clinical trial
- klebsiella pneumoniae
- acinetobacter baumannii
- study protocol
- magnetic resonance
- optic nerve
- genome wide
- anaerobic digestion
- gene expression
- squamous cell carcinoma
- adipose tissue
- glycemic control
- randomized controlled trial
- bioinformatics analysis
- combination therapy
- skeletal muscle
- pseudomonas aeruginosa