Active (Opt-In) Consent Underestimates Mean BMI-z and the Prevalence of Overweight and Obesity Compared to Passive (Opt-Out) Consent. Evidence from the Healthy Together Victoria and Childhood Obesity Study.
Claudia StrugnellLiliana OrellanaJoshua HaywardLynne MillarBoyd SwinburnSteven AllenderPublished in: International journal of environmental research and public health (2018)
differences between opt-in and opt-out sample estimates (bias) for mean BMI-z, prevalence of overweight/obesity and obesity (alone). Standardized bias (Std bias) estimates defined as bias/standard error are reported for BMI-z. Results: The results demonstrate strong evidence of non-participation bias for mean BMI-z overall (Std bias = -4.5, p < 0.0001) and for girls (Std bias = -5.4, p < 0.0001), but not for boys (Std bias = -1.1, p = 0.15). The opt-in strategy underestimated the overall population prevalence of overweight/obesity and obesity by -5.4 and -4.5 percentage points respectively (p < 0.001 for both). Significant underestimation was seen in girls, but not for boys. Conclusions: Opt-in consent underestimated prevalence of childhood obesity, particularly in girls. Prevalence, monitoring and community intervention studies on childhood obesity should move to opt-out consent processes for better scientific outcomes.