Login / Signup

On the Ethics of Withholding and Withdrawing Unwarranted Diagnoses.

Bjørn Morten HofmannMarianne Lea
Published in: Cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics : CQ : the international journal of healthcare ethics committees (2022)
The number of diagnoses and the number of persons having diagnoses have increased substantially, and studies indicate that diagnoses are given or upheld even if they are unwarranted, that is, that they do not satisfy professionally accepted diagnostic criteria. In this article, the authors investigate the ethics of withholding and withdrawing unwarranted diagnoses. First, they investigate ethical aspects that make it difficult to withhold and to withdraw such diagnoses. Second, they scrutinize whether there are psychological factors, both in persons/patients and healthcare professionals, making it difficult to withdraw and withhold unwarranted diagnoses. Lastly, they use recent elements of the withholding-versus-withdrawing treatment debate in medical ethics to investigate whether there are any differences between withholding and withdrawing treatment and withdrawing and withholding unwarranted diagnoses. The authors conclude that it is crucial to acknowledge and address all these issues to reduce and avoid unwarranted diagnoses.
Keyphrases
  • public health
  • healthcare
  • big data
  • end stage renal disease
  • ejection fraction
  • newly diagnosed
  • chronic kidney disease
  • global health
  • artificial intelligence