Login / Signup

Reliability of the test of gross motor development: A systematic review.

Ezequiel ReyAida Carballo-FazanesCristina Varela-CasalCristian Abelairas-Gomeznull null
Published in: PloS one (2020)
Overall, the results of this systematic review indicate that, regardless of the variant of the test, the TMGD has moderate-to-excellent internal consistency, good-to-excellent inter-rater reliability, good-to-excellent intra-rater reliability, and moderate-to-excellent test-retest reliability. Considering the few high-quality studies in terms of internal consistency, it would be recommend to carry out further studies in this field to improve their quality. Since there is no gold standard for assessing FMS, TGMD variants could be appropriate when opting for a psychometrical robust test. However, standardized training protocols for coding TGMD variants seem to be necessary both for researchers and practitioners in order to ensure acceptable reliability.
Keyphrases
  • systematic review
  • primary care
  • copy number
  • high intensity
  • tyrosine kinase
  • meta analyses
  • randomized controlled trial
  • gene expression
  • case control
  • dna methylation
  • children with cerebral palsy