Login / Signup

Research misconduct in health and life sciences research: A systematic review of retracted literature from Brazilian institutions.

Rafaelly StavaleGraziani Izidoro FerreiraJoão Antônio Martins GalvãoFábio ZickerMaria Rita Carvalho Garbi NovaesCésar Messias de OliveiraDirce Guilhem
Published in: PloS one (2019)
Publications are not retracted solely for research misconduct but also for honest error. Nevertheless, considering authors affiliated with Brazilian institutions, this review concluded that most of the retracted health and life sciences publications were retracted due to research misconduct. Because the number of publications is the most valued indicator of scientific productivity for funding and career progression purposes, a systematic effort from the national research councils, funding agencies, universities and scientific journals is needed to avoid an escalating trend of research misconduct. More investigations are needed to comprehend the underlying factors of research misconduct and its increasing manifestation.
Keyphrases
  • public health
  • healthcare
  • mental health
  • systematic review
  • health information
  • climate change
  • randomized controlled trial
  • human health