Login / Signup

A qualitative systematic review and thematic synthesis exploring the impacts of clinical academic activity by healthcare professionals outside medicine.

Lisa NewingtonMary WellsAdine AdonisLee BoltonLayla Bolton SaghdaouiMargaret M CoffeyJennifer CrowOlga Fadeeva CostaCatherine HughesMatthew SavageLillie ShahabiCaroline M Alexander
Published in: BMC health services research (2021)
Several overlapping sub-themes were identified across the main themes. These included the challenges and benefits of balancing clinical and academic roles, the creation and implementation of new evidence, and the development of collaborations and networks. These may be key areas for organisations to explore when looking to support and increase academic activity among healthcare professionals outside medicine. The modified VICTOR tool is a useful starting point for individuals and organisations to record the impact of their research activity. Further work is needed to explore standardised methods of capturing research impact that address the full range of impacts identified in this systematic review and are specific to the context of clinical academics outside medicine.
Keyphrases
  • systematic review
  • meta analyses
  • primary care
  • randomized controlled trial
  • quality improvement