Evolution of Cardiogenic Shock Management and Development of a Multidisciplinary Team-Based Approach: Ten Years Experience of a Single Center.
Leonardo BelfiorettiMatteo FrancioniIlaria BattistoniLuca AngeliniMaria Vittoria MatassiniGiulia PongettiMatilda ShkozaLuca PiangerelliTommaso PivaElisa NicoliniAlessandro MaoloAndi MuçajPaolo CompagnucciChristopher MunchAntonio Dello RussoMarco Di EusanioMarco MariniPublished in: Journal of clinical medicine (2024)
Background: The management of cardiogenic shock (CS) after ACS has evolved over time, and the development of a multidisciplinary team-based approach has been shown to improve outcomes, although mortality remains high. Methods: All consecutive patients with ACS-CS admitted at our CICU from March 2012 to July 2021 were included in this single-center retrospective study. In 2019, we established a "shock team" consisting of a cardiac intensivist, an interventional cardiologist, an anesthetist, and a cardiac surgeon. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Results: We included 167 patients [males 67%; age 71 (61-80) years] with ischemic CS. The proportion of SCAI shock stages from A to E were 3.6%, 6.6%, 69.4%, 9.6%, and 10.8%, respectively, with a mean baseline serum lactate of 5.2 (3.1-8.8) mmol/L. Sixty-six percent of patients had severe LV dysfunction, and 76.1% needed ≥ 1 inotropic drug. Mechanical cardiac support (MCS) was pursued in 91.1% [65% IABP, 23% Impella CP, 4% VA-ECMO]. From March 2012 to July 2021, we observed a significative temporal trend in mortality reduction from 57% to 29% (OR = 0.90, p = 0.0015). Over time, CS management has changed, with a significant increase in Impella catheter use ( p = 0.0005) and a greater use of dobutamine and levosimendan ( p = 0.015 and p = 0.0001) as inotropic support. In-hospital mortality varied across SCAI shock stages, and the SCAI E profile was associated with a poor prognosis regardless of patient age (OR 28.50, p = 0.039). Conclusions: The temporal trend mortality reduction in CS patients is multifactorial, and it could be explained by the multidisciplinary care developed over the years.
Keyphrases
- end stage renal disease
- poor prognosis
- chronic kidney disease
- ejection fraction
- peritoneal dialysis
- prognostic factors
- acute coronary syndrome
- heart failure
- emergency department
- left ventricular
- oxidative stress
- extracorporeal membrane oxygenation
- cardiac surgery
- patient reported outcomes
- long non coding rna
- coronary artery disease
- early onset
- cardiovascular disease
- pain management
- left ventricular assist device
- health insurance