Successful Reimplantation of Spinal Cord Stimulator One Year after Device Removal Due to Infection.
Ruben H SchwartzWarren A SoutherlandIvan UritsAlan David KayeOmar ViswanathCyrus YazdiPublished in: Surgery journal (New York, N.Y.) (2021)
Spinal cord stimulation is an effective treatment modality for patients with numerous pain conditions. Although proven to be highly successful, device implantation does come with some inherent risks. One of the most challenging complications is perioperative infection. For most patients, a simple trial of oral antibiotics and in-office drainage of any superficial infectious material may be sufficient. Deeper infections with wound dehiscence necessitate device removal and intravenous antibiotic therapy. The question remains, if the device was previously providing pain relief for the patient, when is the appropriate time to reimplant the device after the infection has cleared? We describe the case of explantation of an infected device and successful reimplantation after 1 year.
Keyphrases
- spinal cord
- neuropathic pain
- chronic pain
- spinal cord injury
- end stage renal disease
- pain management
- ejection fraction
- randomized controlled trial
- stem cells
- newly diagnosed
- acute kidney injury
- study protocol
- cardiac surgery
- case report
- peritoneal dialysis
- risk assessment
- low dose
- patient reported outcomes
- climate change
- ultrasound guided
- phase ii
- patient reported
- placebo controlled