Research integrity and peer review

Keyphrases

Publications

volume 9, number 1, 2024

Irina Ibragimova, Helen A Fulbright
Librarians and information specialists as methodological peer-reviewers: a case-study of the International Journal of Health Governance. Research integrity and peer review 9 (1) (2024)
Stephen R Midway, Laura Hendee, Daniel J Daugherty
Peer review trends in six fisheries science journals. Research integrity and peer review 9 (1) (2024)
Thandeka P Nkosi, Chanelle Mulopo, Bey-Marrié Schmidt
Perceptions, experiences, and motivation of COVID-19 vaccine trial participants in South Africa: a qualitative study. Research integrity and peer review 9 (1) (2024)
Priya Silverstein, Colin Elman, Amanda Kay Montoya, Barbara McGillivray, Charlotte R Pennington, Chase H Harrison, Crystal N Steltenpohl, Jan Philipp Röer, Katherine S Corker, Lisa M Charron, Mahmoud Medhat Elsherif, Mario Malicki, Rachel Hayes-Harb, Sandra Grinschgl, Tess M S Neal, Thomas Rhys Evans, Veli-Matti Karhulahti, William L D Krenzer, Anabel Belaus, David Moreau, Débora Inés Burin, Elizabeth Chin, Esther Plomp, Evan Mayo-Wilson, Jared Lyle, Jonathan M Adler, Julia G Bottesini, Katherine M Lawson, Kathleen E Schmidt, Kyrani Reneau, Lars Vilhuber, Ludo Waltman, Morton Ann Gernsbacher, Paul E Plonski, Sakshi Ghai, Sean Patrick Grant, Thu-Mai Christian, William Xiang Quan Ngiam, Moin Syed
A guide for social science journal editors on easing into open science. Research integrity and peer review 9 (1) (2024)
Ariel Maia Lyons-Warren, Whitley W Aamodt, Kathleen M Pieper, Roy E Strowd
A structured, journal-led peer-review mentoring program enhances peer review training. Research integrity and peer review 9 (1) (2024)
David Blanco, Márcio Vinícius Fagundes Donadio, Aida Cadellans-Arróniz
Enhancing reporting through structure: a before and after study on the effectiveness of SPIRIT-based templates to improve the completeness of reporting of randomized controlled trial protocols. Research integrity and peer review 9 (1) (2024)
Thandeka P Nkosi, Chanelle Mulopo, Bey-Marrié Schmidt
Perceptions, experiences, and motivation of COVID-19 vaccine trial participants in South Africa: a qualitative study. Research integrity and peer review 9 (1) (2024)
Stephen R Midway, Laura Hendee, Daniel J Daugherty
Peer review trends in six fisheries science journals. Research integrity and peer review 9 (1) (2024)
Angela Coderre-Ball, Susan Paula Phillips
Extent, transparency and impact of industry funding for pelvic mesh research: a review of the literature. Research integrity and peer review 9 (1) (2024)
David Blanco, Márcio Vinícius Fagundes Donadio, Aida Cadellans-Arróniz
Enhancing reporting through structure: a before and after study on the effectiveness of SPIRIT-based templates to improve the completeness of reporting of randomized controlled trial protocols. Research integrity and peer review 9 (1) (2024)
David Blanco, Márcio Vinícius Fagundes Donadio, Aida Cadellans-Arróniz
Enhancing reporting through structure: a before and after study on the effectiveness of SPIRIT-based templates to improve the completeness of reporting of randomized controlled trial protocols. Research integrity and peer review 9 (1) (2024)
Priya Silverstein, Colin Elman, Amanda Kay Montoya, Barbara McGillivray, Charlotte R Pennington, Chase H Harrison, Crystal N Steltenpohl, Jan Philipp Röer, Katherine S Corker, Lisa M Charron, Mahmoud Medhat Elsherif, Mario Malicki, Rachel Hayes-Harb, Sandra Grinschgl, Tess M S Neal, Thomas Rhys Evans, Veli-Matti Karhulahti, William L D Krenzer, Anabel Belaus, David Moreau, Débora Inés Burin, Elizabeth Chin, Esther Plomp, Evan Mayo-Wilson, Jared Lyle, Jonathan M Adler, Julia G Bottesini, Katherine M Lawson, Kathleen E Schmidt, Kyrani Reneau, Lars Vilhuber, Ludo Waltman, Morton Ann Gernsbacher, Paul E Plonski, Sakshi Ghai, Sean Patrick Grant, Thu-Mai Christian, William Xiang Quan Ngiam, Moin Syed
A guide for social science journal editors on easing into open science. Research integrity and peer review 9 (1) (2024)
Oliver J Fisher, Debra Fearnshaw, Nicholas J Watson, Peter Green, Fiona Charnley, Duncan McFarlane, Sarah Sharples
Promoting equality, diversity and inclusion in research and funding: reflections from a digital manufacturing research network. Research integrity and peer review 9 (1) (2024)
Stephen R Midway, Laura Hendee, Daniel J Daugherty
Peer review trends in six fisheries science journals. Research integrity and peer review 9 (1) (2024)
Priya Silverstein, Colin Elman, Amanda Kay Montoya, Barbara McGillivray, Charlotte R Pennington, Chase H Harrison, Crystal N Steltenpohl, Jan Philipp Röer, Katherine S Corker, Lisa M Charron, Mahmoud Medhat Elsherif, Mario Malicki, Rachel Hayes-Harb, Sandra Grinschgl, Tess M S Neal, Thomas Rhys Evans, Veli-Matti Karhulahti, William L D Krenzer, Anabel Belaus, David Moreau, Débora Inés Burin, Elizabeth Chin, Esther Plomp, Evan Mayo-Wilson, Jared Lyle, Jonathan M Adler, Julia G Bottesini, Katherine M Lawson, Kathleen E Schmidt, Kyrani Reneau, Lars Vilhuber, Ludo Waltman, Morton Ann Gernsbacher, Paul E Plonski, Sakshi Ghai, Sean Patrick Grant, Thu-Mai Christian, William Xiang Quan Ngiam, Moin Syed
A guide for social science journal editors on easing into open science. Research integrity and peer review 9 (1) (2024)
Thandeka P Nkosi, Chanelle Mulopo, Bey-Marrié Schmidt
Perceptions, experiences, and motivation of COVID-19 vaccine trial participants in South Africa: a qualitative study. Research integrity and peer review 9 (1) (2024)
Irina Ibragimova, Helen A Fulbright
Librarians and information specialists as methodological peer-reviewers: a case-study of the International Journal of Health Governance. Research integrity and peer review 9 (1) (2024)
Krishna Subedi, Nuwadatta Subedi, Rebicca Ranjit
Knowledge and practices of plagiarism among journal editors of Nepal. Research integrity and peer review 9 (1) (2024)
Krishna Subedi, Nuwadatta Subedi, Rebicca Ranjit
Knowledge and practices of plagiarism among journal editors of Nepal. Research integrity and peer review 9 (1) (2024)
Angela Coderre-Ball, Susan Paula Phillips
Extent, transparency and impact of industry funding for pelvic mesh research: a review of the literature. Research integrity and peer review 9 (1) (2024)
Oliver J Fisher, Debra Fearnshaw, Nicholas J Watson, Peter Green, Fiona Charnley, Duncan McFarlane, Sarah Sharples
Promoting equality, diversity and inclusion in research and funding: reflections from a digital manufacturing research network. Research integrity and peer review 9 (1) (2024)
Ariel Maia Lyons-Warren, Whitley W Aamodt, Kathleen M Pieper, Roy E Strowd
A structured, journal-led peer-review mentoring program enhances peer review training. Research integrity and peer review 9 (1) (2024)
Krishna Subedi, Nuwadatta Subedi, Rebicca Ranjit
Knowledge and practices of plagiarism among journal editors of Nepal. Research integrity and peer review 9 (1) (2024)
Oliver J Fisher, Debra Fearnshaw, Nicholas J Watson, Peter Green, Fiona Charnley, Duncan McFarlane, Sarah Sharples
Promoting equality, diversity and inclusion in research and funding: reflections from a digital manufacturing research network. Research integrity and peer review 9 (1) (2024)
Ariel Maia Lyons-Warren, Whitley W Aamodt, Kathleen M Pieper, Roy E Strowd
A structured, journal-led peer-review mentoring program enhances peer review training. Research integrity and peer review 9 (1) (2024)

volume 8, number 1, 2023

Karen B Schmaling, Stephen A Gallo
Gender differences in peer reviewed grant applications, awards, and amounts: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Research integrity and peer review 8 (1) (2023)
Thomas V Perneger
Authorship and citation patterns of highly cited biomedical researchers: a cross-sectional study. Research integrity and peer review 8 (1) (2023)
Anna Nuechterlein, Tanya Barretto, Alaa Yehia, Judy Illes
Bridges of perspectives: representation of people with lived experience of spinal cord injury in editorial boards and peer review. Research integrity and peer review 8 (1) (2023)
Karen B Schmaling, Stephen A Gallo
Gender differences in peer reviewed grant applications, awards, and amounts: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Research integrity and peer review 8 (1) (2023)
Allana G LeBlanc, Joel D Barnes, Travis J Saunders, Mark S Tremblay, Jean-Philippe Chaput
Scientific sinkhole: estimating the cost of peer review based on survey data with snowball sampling. Research integrity and peer review 8 (1) (2023)
Allana G LeBlanc, Joel D Barnes, Travis J Saunders, Mark S Tremblay, Jean-Philippe Chaput
Scientific sinkhole: estimating the cost of peer review based on survey data with snowball sampling. Research integrity and peer review 8 (1) (2023)
Piitu Parmanne, Joonas Laajava, Noora Järvinen, Terttu Harju, Mauri Marttunen, Pertti Saloheimo
Peer reviewers' willingness to review, their recommendations and quality of reviews after the Finnish Medical Journal switched from single-blind to double-blind peer review. Research integrity and peer review 8 (1) (2023)
Karen B Schmaling, Stephen A Gallo
Gender differences in peer reviewed grant applications, awards, and amounts: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Research integrity and peer review 8 (1) (2023)
Aurélien Allard, Anna Catharina Vieira Armond, Mads Paludan Goddiksen, Mikkel Willum Johansen, Hillar Loor, Céline Schöpfer, Orsolya Varga, Christine Clavien
The quizzical failure of a nudge on academic integrity education: a randomized controlled trial. Research integrity and peer review 8 (1) (2023)
Allana G LeBlanc, Joel D Barnes, Travis J Saunders, Mark S Tremblay, Jean-Philippe Chaput
Scientific sinkhole: estimating the cost of peer review based on survey data with snowball sampling. Research integrity and peer review 8 (1) (2023)
Allana G LeBlanc, Joel D Barnes, Travis J Saunders, Mark S Tremblay, Jean-Philippe Chaput
Scientific sinkhole: estimating the cost of peer review based on survey data with snowball sampling. Research integrity and peer review 8 (1) (2023)
Gregory M Eckhartt, Graeme D Ruxton
Investigating and preventing scientific misconduct using Benford's Law. Research integrity and peer review 8 (1) (2023)
Sherif Ahmed Kamel, Tamer A El-Sobky
Reporting quality of abstracts and inconsistencies with full text articles in pediatric orthopedic publications. Research integrity and peer review 8 (1) (2023)
Mohammad Hosseini, S P J M Serge Horbach
Fighting reviewer fatigue or amplifying bias? Considerations and recommendations for use of ChatGPT and other large language models in scholarly peer review. Research integrity and peer review 8 (1) (2023)
Stephen A Gallo, Michael Pearce, Carole J Lee, Elena A Erosheva
A new approach to grant review assessments: score, then rank. Research integrity and peer review 8 (1) (2023)
Fabrice Frank, Nans Florens, Gideon Meyerowitz-Katz, Jérôme Barrière, Eric Billy, Véronique Saada, Alexander Samuel, Jacques Robert, Lonni Besançon
Raising concerns on questionable ethics approvals - a case study of 456 trials from the Institut Hospitalo-Universitaire Méditerranée Infection. Research integrity and peer review 8 (1) (2023)
Thomas V Perneger
Authorship and citation patterns of highly cited biomedical researchers: a cross-sectional study. Research integrity and peer review 8 (1) (2023)
Allana G LeBlanc, Joel D Barnes, Travis J Saunders, Mark S Tremblay, Jean-Philippe Chaput
Scientific sinkhole: estimating the cost of peer review based on survey data with snowball sampling. Research integrity and peer review 8 (1) (2023)
Mohammad Hosseini, Serge P J M Horbach
Publisher Correction: Fighting reviewer fatigue or amplifying bias? Considerations and recommendations for use of ChatGPT and other large language models in scholarly peer review. Research integrity and peer review 8 (1) (2023)
Yi Kai Ong, Kay L Double, Lisa Bero, Joanna Diong
Responsible research practices could be more strongly endorsed by Australian university codes of research conduct. Research integrity and peer review 8 (1) (2023)
Ben W Mol, Shimona Lai, Ayesha Rahim, Esmée M Bordewijk, Rui Wang, Rik van Eekelen, Lyle C Gurrin, Jim G Thornton, Madelon van Wely, Wentao Li
Checklist to assess Trustworthiness in RAndomised Controlled Trials (TRACT checklist): concept proposal and pilot. Research integrity and peer review 8 (1) (2023)
Edwin Were, Jepchirchir Kiplagat, Eunice Kaguiri, Rose Ayikukwei, Violet Naanyu
Institutional capacity to prevent and manage research misconduct: perspectives from Kenyan research regulators. Research integrity and peer review 8 (1) (2023)
Mohammad Hosseini, S P J M Serge Horbach
Fighting reviewer fatigue or amplifying bias? Considerations and recommendations for use of ChatGPT and other large language models in scholarly peer review. Research integrity and peer review 8 (1) (2023)

volume 7, number 1, 2022

Jodi Schneider, Nathan D Woods, Randi Proescholdt, null null
Reducing the Inadvertent Spread of Retracted Science: recommendations from the RISRS report. Research integrity and peer review 7 (1) (2022)
Omar Dewidar, Nour Elmestekawy, Vivian Welch
Improving equity, diversity, and inclusion in academia. Research integrity and peer review 7 (1) (2022)