Login / Signup

Protecting the Vulnerable and Including the Under-Represented: IRB Practices and Attitudes.

Luke GelinasDavid H StraussYing ChenHayat R AhmedAaron KirbyPhoebe FriesenBarbara E Bierer
Published in: Journal of empirical research on human research ethics : JERHRE (2022)
Since their inception, Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) have been charged with protecting the vulnerable in research. More recently, attention has turned to whether IRBs also have a role to play in ensuring representative study samples and promoting the inclusion of historically under-represented groups. These two aims-protecting the vulnerable and including the under-represented-can pull in different directions, given the potential for overlap between the vulnerable and the under-represented. We conducted a pilot, online national survey of IRB Chairs to gauge attitudes and practices with regard to protecting the vulnerable and including the under-represented in research. We found that IRBs extend the concept of vulnerability to different groups across various contexts, are confident that they effectively protect vulnerable individuals in research, and believe that IRBs have a role to play in ensuring representative samples and the inclusion of under-represented groups.
Keyphrases
  • healthcare
  • primary care
  • cross sectional
  • randomized controlled trial
  • working memory
  • clinical trial
  • ultrasound guided