Login / Signup

Lessons learnt on the impact of an unprecedented soil decontamination program in Fukushima on contaminant fluxes.

Rosalie VandrommeSeiji HayashiHideki TsujiOlivier EvrardThomas GrangeonValentin LandemaineJohn Patrick LacebyYoshifumi WakiyamaOlivier Cerdan
Published in: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America (2023)
In the context of elevated concerns related to nuclear accidents and warfare, the lessons learnt from the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant accident in 2011 are important. In particular, Japanese authorities implemented an ambitious decontamination program to reduce the air dose rate in order to facilitate the return of the local inhabitants to previously evacuated areas. This approach contrasts the strategy adopted in Chernobyl, where the most contaminated areas remain off limits. Nonetheless, the effectiveness of the Japanese decontamination strategy on the dispersion of radioactive contaminant fluxes across mountainous landscapes exposed to typhoons has not been quantified. Based on the unique combination of river monitoring and modeling in a catchment representative of the most impacted area in Japan, we demonstrate that decontamination of 16% of the catchment area resulted in a decrease of 17% of sediment-bound radioactive fluxes in rivers. Decontamination operations were therefore relatively effective, although they could only be conducted in a small part of the area due to the dominance of steep forested slopes. In fact, 67% of the initial radiocesium contamination was calculated to remain stored in forested landscapes, which may contribute to future downstream radiocesium dispersion during erosive events. Given that only a limited proportion of the initial population had returned in 2019 (~30%), it raises the question as to whether decontaminating a small percentage of the contaminated area was worth the effort, the price, and the amount of waste generated?
Keyphrases
  • heavy metals
  • drinking water
  • quality improvement
  • randomized controlled trial
  • cross sectional
  • climate change
  • human health
  • life cycle