Login / Signup

Wound infection following implant removal of foot, ankle, lower leg or patella; a protocol for a multicenter randomized controlled trial investigating the (cost-)effectiveness of 2 g of prophylactic cefazolin compared to placebo (WIFI-2 trial).

Fay R K SandersDiederick PenningManouk BackesSiem A DingemansSusan van DierenAnne M EskesJ Carel GoslingsPeter KloenRon A A MathôtNiels W L SchepIngrid J B SpijkermanTim Schepers
Published in: BMC surgery (2021)
If 2 g of prophylactic cefazolin proves to be both effective and cost-effective in preventing SSI, this would have implications for current guidelines. Combined with the high infection rate of IR which previous studies have shown, it would be sufficiently substantiated for guidelines to suggest protocolled use of prophylactic antibiotics in IR of foot, ankle, lower leg or patella. Trial registration Nederlands Trial Register (NTR): NL8284, registered on 9th of January 2020, https://www.trialregister.nl/trial/8284.
Keyphrases
  • study protocol
  • phase iii
  • randomized controlled trial
  • phase ii
  • clinical trial
  • double blind
  • clinical practice
  • cross sectional
  • placebo controlled
  • wound healing