Login / Signup

Ultraconserved enhancer function does not require perfect sequence conservation.

Valentina SnetkovaAthena R YpsilantiJennifer A AkiyamaBrandon J MannionIngrid Plajzer-FrickCatherine S NovakAnne N HarringtonQuan T PhamMomoe KatoYiwen ZhuJaneth GodoyEman MekyRiana D HunterMarie ShiEvgeny Z KvonVeena AfzalStella TranJohn L R RubensteinAxel ViselLen A PennacchioDiane E Dickel
Published in: Nature genetics (2021)
Ultraconserved enhancer sequences show perfect conservation between human and rodent genomes, suggesting that their functions are highly sensitive to mutation. However, current models of enhancer function do not sufficiently explain this extreme evolutionary constraint. We subjected 23 ultraconserved enhancers to different levels of mutagenesis, collectively introducing 1,547 mutations, and examined their activities in transgenic mouse reporter assays. Overall, we find that the regulatory properties of ultraconserved enhancers are robust to mutation. Upon mutagenesis, nearly all (19/23, 83%) still functioned as enhancers at one developmental stage, as did most of those tested again later in development (5/9, 56%). Replacement of endogenous enhancers with mutated alleles in mice corroborated results of transgenic assays, including the functional resilience of ultraconserved enhancers to mutation. Our findings show that the currently known activities of ultraconserved enhancers do not necessarily require the perfect conservation observed in evolution and suggest that additional regulatory or other functions contribute to their sequence constraint.
Keyphrases
  • transcription factor
  • crispr cas
  • binding protein
  • social support
  • skeletal muscle
  • mass spectrometry
  • fluorescent probe