Framing a Consent Form to Improve Consent Understanding and Determine How This Affects Willingness to Participate in HIV Cure Research: An Experimental Survey Study.
John A SaucedaKarine DubéBrandon BrownAshley E PérezCatherine E RivasDavid EvansCelia B FisherPublished in: Journal of empirical research on human research ethics : JERHRE (2020)
HIV cure research carries serious risks and negligible benefits. We investigated how participants understand these risks and what influences their willingness to participate. Through internet-based and in-person convenience sampling, 86 HIV+ participants completed an experimental survey. Participants were randomized to read a standard consent form describing a hypothetical HIV cure study or one adapted using Fuzzy Trace Theory-a decision-making model to facilitate complex information processing. We measured consent understanding and cognitive (e.g., safe/harmful) and affective (e.g., concerning, satisfying) evaluations of HIV cure research. Participants who read the adapted consent form had improved consent understanding, but only positive affective evaluations were associated with a willingness to participate. Consent processes can use decision-making theories to facilitate comprehension of study information.
Keyphrases
- antiretroviral therapy
- hiv positive
- hiv testing
- hiv infected
- human immunodeficiency virus
- hiv aids
- hepatitis c virus
- men who have sex with men
- decision making
- south africa
- clinical trial
- randomized controlled trial
- human health
- double blind
- cross sectional
- healthcare
- heavy metals
- risk assessment
- health information
- high speed
- placebo controlled
- open label