Login / Signup

Assessment of blind predictions of the clinical significance of BRCA1 and BRCA2 variants.

Melissa S ClineGiulia BabbiSandra BonacheYue CaoRita CasadioXavier de la CruzOrland DíezSara Gutiérrez-EnríquezPanagiostis KatsonisCarmen LaiOlivier LichtargePier Luigi MartelliGilad MishneAlejandro Moles-FernándezGemma MontalbanSean D MooneyRobert O'ConnerLars OotesSelen ÖzkanNatalia PadillaKymberleigh A PagelVikas PejaverPredrag RadivojacCasandra RieraCastrense SavojardoYang ShenYuanfei SunScott TopperMichael T ParsonsAmanda B SpurdleDavid E Goldgarnull null
Published in: Human mutation (2019)
Testing for variation in BRCA1 and BRCA2 (commonly referred to as BRCA1/2), has emerged as a standard clinical practice and is helping countless women better understand and manage their heritable risk of breast and ovarian cancer. Yet the increased rate of BRCA1/2 testing has led to an increasing number of Variants of Uncertain Significance (VUS), and the rate of VUS discovery currently outpaces the rate of clinical variant interpretation. Computational prediction is a key component of the variant interpretation pipeline. In the CAGI5 ENIGMA Challenge, six prediction teams submitted predictions on 326 newly-interpreted variants from the ENIGMA Consortium. By evaluating these predictions against the new interpretations, we have gained a number of insights on the state of the art of variant prediction and specific steps to further advance this state of the art.
Keyphrases
  • breast cancer risk
  • copy number
  • clinical practice
  • small molecule
  • high throughput
  • polycystic ovary syndrome
  • pregnant women
  • dna methylation
  • cervical cancer screening