Methodological quality of 100 recent systematic reviews of health-related outcome measurement instruments: an overview of reviews.
Ellen Bernadette Maria ElsmanLidwine B MokkinkInger L AbmaOlalekan Lee AiyegbusiAlessandro ChiarottoKirstie L HaywoodKaren Matvienko-SikarDaniëlla M OosterveerJan J M PoolIlse E J Swinkels-MeewisseMartin OffringaCaroline B TerweePublished in: Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation (2024)
Despite clear improvements in risk of bias assessments, measurement property evaluation and data synthesis, specifying the research question, conducting the search strategy and performing a certainty assessment remain poor. To ensure that systematic reviews of OMIs meet current scientific standards, more consistent conduct and reporting of systematic reviews of OMIs is needed.