Login / Signup

How can clinicians choose between conflicting and discordant systematic reviews? A replication study of the Jadad algorithm.

Carole LunnySai Surabi ThirugnanasampantharSalmaan KanjiNicola FerriDawid PieperS WhitelawS TasnimH NelsonE K ReidJia He Janet ZhangBanveer KalkatYuan ChiReema AbdoulrezzakDi Wen ZhengLindy R S PangkaDian Xin Ran WangParisa SafaviAnmol SoochKevin T KangAndrea C Tricco
Published in: BMC medical research methodology (2022)
Our results suggest that the Jadad algorithm is not reproducible between users as there are no prescriptive instructions about how to operationalise the algorithm. In the absence of a validated algorithm, we recommend that healthcare providers, policy makers, patients and researchers address conflicts between review findings by choosing the SR(s) with meta-analysis of RCTs that most closely resemble their clinical, public health, or policy question, are the most recent, comprehensive (i.e. number of included RCTs), and at the lowest risk of bias.
Keyphrases