Login / Signup

A Framework for Quality Control in Quantitative Proteomics.

Kristine A TsantilasGennifer E MerrihewJulia E RobbinsRichard S JohnsonJea ParkDeanna L PlubellJesse D CanterburyEric HuangMichael RiffleVagisha SharmaBrendan X MacLeanJosh EckelsChristine C WuMichael S BeremanSandra Elizabeth SpencerAndrew N HoofnagleMichael J MacCoss
Published in: Journal of proteome research (2024)
A thorough evaluation of the quality, reproducibility, and variability of bottom-up proteomics data is necessary at every stage of a workflow, from planning to analysis. We share vignettes applying adaptable quality control (QC) measures to assess sample preparation, system function, and quantitative analysis. System suitability samples are repeatedly measured longitudinally with targeted methods, and we share examples where they are used on three instrument platforms to identify severe system failures and track function over months to years. Internal QCs incorporated at the protein and peptide levels allow our team to assess sample preparation issues and to differentiate system failures from sample-specific issues. External QC samples prepared alongside our experimental samples are used to verify the consistency and quantitative potential of our results during batch correction and normalization before assessing biological phenotypes. We combine these controls with rapid analysis (Skyline), longitudinal QC metrics (AutoQC), and server-based data deposition (PanoramaWeb). We propose that this integrated approach to QC is a useful starting point for groups to facilitate rapid quality control assessment to ensure that valuable instrument time is used to collect the best quality data possible. Data are available on Panorama Public and ProteomeXchange under the identifier PXD051318.
Keyphrases