Prolonged disorders of consciousness: identification using the UK FIM + FAM and cohort analysis of outcomes from a UK national clinical database.
Lynne Turner-StokesHilary RoseAlison KnightHeather WilliamsRichard John SiegertStephen A AshfordPublished in: Disability and rehabilitation (2022)
In absence of a dedicated PDOC registry, FIM + FAM scores can identify patients in VS/MCS at population level. Identifying those who emerge and providing timely rehabilitation generates cost-savings well-exceeding the cost of the evaluation/rehabilitation programme.Implications for rehabilitationThe UK National Health Service currently collects no systematic data to identify patients in PDOC, so we have no accurate information on how many patients there are, where they are managed or what their outcomes are.In the absence of more direct data, total FIM + FAM scores of < =31 and 32-35 respectively can be used to identify patients in vegetative and minimally conscious states.Of the 365 or so patients admitted to specialist rehabilitation units per year, 43% emerge into consciousness leaving about 150 patients per year in PDOC states that are likely to be permanent.Identifying those who emerge and providing timely rehabilitation generates cost-savings that pay for the entire PDOC evaluation/rehabilitation programme many times over.
Keyphrases
- end stage renal disease
- ejection fraction
- chronic kidney disease
- newly diagnosed
- randomized controlled trial
- clinical trial
- peritoneal dialysis
- machine learning
- metabolic syndrome
- palliative care
- cross sectional
- adipose tissue
- quality improvement
- mass spectrometry
- weight loss
- data analysis
- drug induced
- clinical evaluation