Cardiovascular Outcomes after Paclitaxel-Coated Balloon Angioplasty versus Drug-Eluting Stent Placement for Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Yuki KondoTetsuya IshikawaMasatoshi ShimuraKota YamadaTomoaki UkajiYohei TamuraMiona AraiKahoko MoriTaro TakeyamaYuichi HoriItaru HisauchiShiro NakaharaYuji ItabashiSayuki KobayashiIsao TaguchiPublished in: Journal of clinical medicine (2024)
Background : We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to examine the feasibility of paclitaxel-coated balloon (PCB) angioplasty for de novo lesions in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) by comparing with drug-eluting stent (DES) placement. Methods : By a systematic literature search, nine (five randomized controlled, two retrospective propensity-score matched, and two retrospective baseline-balanced) studies comparing the midterm clinical and angiographic outcomes after PCB angioplasty and DES placement were included, yielding 974 and 1130 ACS cases in PCB and DES groups, respectively. Major adverse cardiac event (MACE) was defined as a composite of cardiac mortality (CM), all-cause mortality (ACM), myocardial infarction (MI), target vessel revascularization (TVR), and target lesion revascularization (TLR). Late luminal loss (LLL) and bleeding events (BLD) were also estimated. Results : The frequencies of MACE in PCB and DES groups were 8.42% and 10.62%, respectively. PCB angioplasty had no significant impacts on all of MACE (risk ratio: 0.90, 95%CI: 0.68-1.18, p = 0.44), CM, ACM, MI, TVR, TLR, BLD, and LLL, compared to DES placement in random-effects model. Conclusions : The present systematic review and meta-analysis showed the feasibility of PCB angioplasty for the de novo lesions in patients with ACS in comparison with DES placement by the emergent procedures.
Keyphrases
- acute coronary syndrome
- percutaneous coronary intervention
- ultrasound guided
- left ventricular
- antiplatelet therapy
- toll like receptor
- inflammatory response
- heart failure
- coronary artery bypass grafting
- immune response
- cross sectional
- systematic review
- open label
- randomized controlled trial
- cardiovascular disease
- clinical trial
- type diabetes
- coronary artery disease
- cardiovascular events
- study protocol