Operative Airway Exposure in an Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Training Program. A Survey of Current Trainees.

To survey Otolaryngology residents to evaluate their operative airway exposure during their training and to assess if the exposure was adequate to decide whether to pursue fellowship in pediatric. A modified and validated survey was distributed among otolaryngology trainees in the Western region of Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. It assesses operative airway exposure during training, adequacy of experience to decide on whether to pursue fellowship in pediatric otolaryngology, and plan to perform the following six procedures (diagnostic rigid bronchoscopy, diagnostic flexible bronchoscopy, endoscopic airway foreign body removal, rigid esophagoscopy with or without foreign body removal, suspension microlaryngoscopy procedures, open tracheostomy) in practice. Only 24/60 (60%) of respondents perceived that they had adequate training as to whether or not to make them decide to pursue fellowship in pediatric. In regard to over all assessment of the level of exposure: the vast majority of trainees regarded the training as adequate 30/60 (50%), 3/60 (5%) thought it was excellent, 6/60 (10%) thought it was good, and 21/60 (35%)assessed the training adequacy as poor. 24/33 (72.7%) perceived that the presence of a pediatric fellow with them enhanced their training. In regards to performing surgeries after training, 78% were planning to perform rigid bronchoscopy, flexible bronchoscopy (58%), endoscopic airway FB removal (92%), esophagoscopy (54%), suspension microlaryngoscopy (82%), and open tracheostomy (100%). The presence of a pediatric fellow in service was thought of by most residents as being beneficial, however, the exposure to airway surgeries were not adequate as to inform trainees if they want to pursue fellowship in pediatric, when they were not exposed to a fellow.