Minimally Invasive Procedure Versus Conventional Redo Sternotomy for Mitral Valve Surgery in Patients with Previous Cardiac Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Muhammad Ali TariqMinhail Khalid MalikShurjeel Uddin QaziZahabia AltafMariam ZafarPublished in: Journal of chest surgery (2023)
The current literature, which primarily consists of retrospective comparisons, underscores certain benefits of MIMVS over redo MS. These include decreased mortality, shorter hospital and ICU stays, and reduced AKI risk. Given the lack of high-quality evidence, prospective randomized control trials with adequate power are necessary to investigate long-term outcomes.
Keyphrases
- minimally invasive
- mitral valve
- aortic valve replacement
- cardiac surgery
- acute kidney injury
- transcatheter aortic valve implantation
- aortic stenosis
- double blind
- aortic valve
- open label
- systematic review
- intensive care unit
- robot assisted
- mass spectrometry
- left ventricular
- left atrial
- healthcare
- placebo controlled
- cardiovascular events
- multiple sclerosis
- phase iii
- cross sectional
- ms ms
- phase ii
- clinical trial
- emergency department
- ejection fraction
- adverse drug
- randomized controlled trial
- atrial fibrillation
- surgical site infection
- study protocol