Registry-based randomised clinical trial: efficient evaluation of generic pharmacotherapies in the contemporary era.
Troels YndigegnRobin HofmannTomas JernbergChris P GalePublished in: Heart (British Cardiac Society) (2018)
Randomised clinical trials are the gold standard for testing the effectiveness of clinical interventions. However, increasing complexity and associated costs may limit their application in the investigation of key cardiovascular knowledge gaps such as the re-evaluation of generic pharmacotherapies. The registry-based randomised clinical trial (RRCT) leverages data sampling from nationwide quality registries to facilitate high participant inclusion rates at comparably low costs and, therefore, may offer a mechanism by which such clinical questions may be answered. To date, a number of studies have been conducted using such trial designs, but uncritical use of the RRCT design may lead to erroneous conclusions. The current review provides insights into the strengths and weaknesses of the RRCT, as well as provides an exploratory example of how a trial may be designed to test the long-term effectiveness of beta blockers in patients with myocardial infarction who have preserved left ventricular systolic function.
Keyphrases
- clinical trial
- left ventricular
- phase ii
- phase iii
- open label
- study protocol
- double blind
- heart failure
- randomized controlled trial
- systematic review
- blood pressure
- healthcare
- placebo controlled
- physical activity
- mitral valve
- coronary artery disease
- acute myocardial infarction
- machine learning
- big data
- angiotensin converting enzyme
- artificial intelligence
- atrial fibrillation
- cross sectional
- aortic stenosis
- aortic valve
- ejection fraction
- transcatheter aortic valve replacement