Implementing a Non-Specialist Delivered Psychological Intervention for Young Adolescents in a Protracted Refugee Setting: a Qualitative Process Evaluation in Lebanon.
Rayane AliFelicity L BrownKerrie StevensonMark JordansKarine TahaMounif El AmineFrederik SteenBassel MeksassiJoseph EliasMay AounBayard RobertsMarit SijbrandijPim CuijpersAemal AkhtarAiysha MalikAniek WoodwardDaniela C Fuhrnull nullPublished in: The journal of behavioral health services & research (2023)
There has been an increase in the evaluation and implementation of non-specialist delivered psychological interventions to address unmet mental health needs in humanitarian emergencies. While randomized controlled trials (RCTs) provide important evidence about intervention impact, complementary qualitative process evaluations are essential to understand key implementation processes and inform future scaling up of the intervention. This study was conducted as part of an RCT of the Early Adolescents Skills for Emotions (EASE) psychological intervention for young adolescents with elevated psychological distress (predominantly with a Syrian refugee background) in Lebanon. Our aims were firstly to conduct a qualitative process evaluation to understand stakeholder experiences and perceived impact of the intervention and identify barriers and facilitators for implementation, and secondly to explore considerations for scaling up. Eleven key informant interviews and seven focus groups were conducted with 39 respondents including adolescent and caregiver participants, trainers, providers, outreach workers, and local stakeholders. Data were analyzed using inductive and deductive thematic analysis. Respondents perceived the intervention to be highly needed and reported improvements in adolescent mental health and wellbeing. Key implementation factors that have potential to influence engagement, adherence, and perceived impact included the socio-economic situation of families, mental health stigma, coordination within and between sectors (particularly for scaling up), embedding the intervention within existing service pathways, having clear quality and accountability processes including training and supervision for non-specialists, and sustainable funding. Our findings provide important context for understanding effectiveness outcomes of the RCT and highlights factors that need to be considered when implementing a mental health intervention on a larger scale in a complex crisis.
Keyphrases
- mental health
- randomized controlled trial
- young adults
- physical activity
- mental illness
- primary care
- quality improvement
- healthcare
- systematic review
- depressive symptoms
- study protocol
- social support
- palliative care
- skeletal muscle
- public health
- risk assessment
- hiv aids
- middle aged
- type diabetes
- human health
- adipose tissue
- weight loss
- hepatitis c virus
- hiv infected
- human immunodeficiency virus
- climate change
- sleep quality
- data analysis