Login / Signup

Publishing negative results is good for science.

Elisabeth M Bik
Published in: Access microbiology (2024)
Scientists face challenges in publishing negative results, because most scientific journals are biassed in accepting positive and novel findings. Despite their importance, negative results often go unpublished, leading to duplication of efforts, biassed meta-analyses, and ethical concerns regarding animal and human studies. In this light, the initiative by Access Microbiology to collect and publish negative results in the field of microbiology is a very important and valuable contribution towards unbiassed science.
Keyphrases
  • meta analyses
  • public health
  • systematic review
  • endothelial cells
  • quality improvement
  • randomized controlled trial
  • infectious diseases
  • pluripotent stem cells
  • case control