Login / Signup

David versus Goliath: Early career researchers in an unethical publishing system.

Aurore ReceveurJonathan BonfantiStephanie D'agataAndrew J HelmstetterNikki A MooreBrunno Freire OliveiraCathleen Petit-CailleuxErica Rievrs BorgesMarieke SchultzAaron N SextonDevi Veytia
Published in: Ecology letters (2024)
The publish-or-perish culture in academia has catalysed the development of an unethical publishing system. This system is characterised by the proliferation of journals and publishers-unaffiliated with learned societies or universities-that maintain extremely large revenues and profit margins diverting funds away from the academic community. Early career researchers (ECRs) are particularly vulnerable to the consequences of this publishing system because of intersecting factors, including pressure to pursue high impact publications, rising publication costs and job insecurity. Moving towards a more ethical system requires that scientists advocate for structural change by making career choices that come with risks, many of which disproportionately impact ECRs. We illuminate major issues facing ECRs in Ecology and Evolution under the current publishing system, and propose a portfolio of actions to promote systemic change that can be implemented by ECRs and established researchers.
Keyphrases
  • medical students
  • healthcare
  • mental health
  • randomized controlled trial
  • systematic review
  • social support
  • risk assessment