Login / Signup

"Online Training Is Great but Human Interaction Is Better": Training Preferences of VA Interdisciplinary Palliative Care Consult Teams.

Beverly Rosa WilliamsF Amos BaileyPatricia S GoodeElizabeth A KvaleLaurie A SlayMarie A BakitasKathryn L Burgio
Published in: The American journal of hospice & palliative care (2020)
A growing body of research has examined modalities for delivering palliative care education; however, we know little about education and training preferences of VA interdisciplinary Palliative Care Consult Teams (PCCT). In the BEACON II study, we explored training preferences of PCCTs from 46 Veterans Affairs Medical Centers (VAMCs) participating in either a multisite webinar or a small group, in-person workshop. We interviewed participants by telephone seven to eight month post-training. In all, 75.9% preferred in-person education and training, including 78.9% of workshop participants and 73.1% of webinar participants. Respondents described in-person training as fostering learning through the following processes: (1) active engagement and focus, (2) interaction and networking, (3) meaning-making and relevance, and (4) reciprocity and commitment. Although it is not possible for Web-based palliative care education programs to replicate all aspects of the in-person learning experience, building experiential, interactive, meaningful, and reciprocal components into Web-based education may help shift preferences and make interdisciplinary team-based palliative care education accessible to a larger audience.
Keyphrases
  • palliative care
  • advanced cancer
  • healthcare
  • quality improvement
  • virtual reality
  • endothelial cells
  • social media
  • induced pluripotent stem cells
  • pluripotent stem cells