Comparison of Instructions to Authors and Reporting of Ethics Components in Selected African Biomedical Journals: 2008 and 2017.
Isaac Oluwafemi DipeoluDouglas R WassenaarPublished in: Journal of empirical research on human research ethics : JERHRE (2024)
Journal editors instruct authors to describe human participant protections in original research reports. However, little is known about African biomedical journal authors' adherence to such journal editors' instructions. This study investigated changes in editors' instructions to authors and authors' reporting of research ethics information in selected African biomedical journals between 2008 and 2017. Twelve selected journal websites and online articles were reviewed in Eastern, Southern, and Western African [ESWA] countries. A pre-tested schema and a checklist were used to collect data from journal websites and articles published in 2008 and 2017, and the data were analysed using descriptive and inferential statistics. Half of the journals requested prospective authors to disclose ethics approval and related issues in their manuscripts between 2008 and 2017. There was a significant increase in instructions to authors regarding information on the protection of research participants within this period; more authors complied with these requirements in 2017 than in 2007.
Keyphrases
- big data
- public health
- health information
- south africa
- healthcare
- emergency department
- randomized controlled trial
- systematic review
- type diabetes
- metabolic syndrome
- adipose tissue
- social media
- artificial intelligence
- high resolution
- meta analyses
- cross sectional
- mass spectrometry
- weight loss
- induced pluripotent stem cells