Realist evaluation of a pilot intervention implementing interprofessional and interinstitutional processes for transitional care.
Séverine Schusselé FilliettazStéphane MoirouxGregory MarchandIngrid GillesIsabelle Peytremann-BridevauxPublished in: Home health care services quarterly (2021)
In 2016, in Switzerland, we implemented transitional interprofessional and interinstitutional shared decision-making processes (IIPs) between a short-stay inpatient care unit (SSU) and primary care professionals. Between 2018 and 2019, we evaluated this intervention using a realist design to answer the following questions: for whom, with whom, in which context and how have IIPs been implemented? Our initial theory was tested via interviews with patients, primary care professionals and staff from the SSU. Results showed that a patient's stay at the SSU, with actors committed to facilitating IIPs, reinforced the perceived appropriateness and implementation of those IIPs. However, this appropriateness varied according to different contextual elements, such as the complexity of needs, preexisting collaborative practices and the purpose of the inpatient stay. Since IIPs occurred in a context of fragmented practices, proactive and sustained efforts are required of the actors implementing them and the organizations supporting them.
Keyphrases
- primary care
- quality improvement
- patient safety
- palliative care
- healthcare
- randomized controlled trial
- end stage renal disease
- mental health
- ejection fraction
- newly diagnosed
- general practice
- chronic kidney disease
- peritoneal dialysis
- prognostic factors
- physical activity
- acute care
- clinical trial
- social support
- affordable care act
- health insurance
- patient reported
- oral health