Diagnosing Portal Hypertension with Noninvasive Subharmonic Pressure Estimates from a US Contrast Agent.
Ipshita GuptaJohn R EisenbreyPriscilla MachadoMaria StanczakCorinne E WessnerColette M ShawSriharsha GummadiJonathan M FenkelAllison TanCynthia MillerJulia ParentSusan SchultzMichael C SoulenChandra M SehgalKirk WallaceFlemming ForsbergPublished in: Radiology (2020)
Background The current standard for assessing the severity of portal hypertension is the invasive acquisition of hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG). A noninvasive US-based technique called subharmonic-aided pressure estimation (SHAPE) could reduce risk and enable routine acquisition of these pressure estimates. Purpose To compare quantitative SHAPE to HVPG measurements to diagnose portal hypertension in participants undergoing a transjugular liver biopsy. Materials and Methods This was a prospective cross-sectional trial conducted at two hospitals between April 2015 and March 2019 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT02489045). This trial enrolled participants who were scheduled for transjugular liver biopsy. After standard-of-care transjugular liver biopsy and HVPG pressure measurements, participants received an infusion of a US contrast agent and saline. During infusion, SHAPE data were collected from a portal vein and a hepatic vein, and the difference was compared with HVPG measurements. Correlations between data sets were determined by using the Pearson correlation coefficient, and statistical significance between groups was determined by using the Student t test. Receiver operating characteristic analysis was performed to determine the sensitivity and specificity of SHAPE. Results A total of 125 participants (mean age ± standard deviation, 59 years ± 12; 80 men) with complete data were included. Participants at increased risk for variceal hemorrhage (HVPG ≥12 mm Hg) had a higher mean SHAPE gradient compared with participants with lower HVPGs (0.79 dB ± 2.53 vs -4.95 dB ± 3.44; P < .001), which is equivalent to a sensitivity of 90% (13 of 14; 95% CI: 88, 94) and a specificity of 80% (79 of 99; 95% CI: 76, 84). The SHAPE gradient between the portal and hepatic veins was in good overall agreement with the HVPG measurements (r = 0.68). Conclusion Subharmonic-aided pressure estimation is an accurate noninvasive technique for detecting clinically significant portal hypertension. © RSNA, 2020 Online supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Kiessling in this issue.
Keyphrases
- blood pressure
- cross sectional
- healthcare
- electronic health record
- magnetic resonance
- clinical trial
- ultrasound guided
- big data
- high resolution
- study protocol
- low dose
- fine needle aspiration
- computed tomography
- machine learning
- palliative care
- phase iii
- inferior vena cava
- mass spectrometry
- randomized controlled trial
- clinical practice
- deep learning
- arterial hypertension