Retrospective observational study on the use of acetyl-L-carnitine in ALS.
Serena SassiElisa BianchiLuca DiamantiDanilo TornabeneElisabetta SetteDoriana MediciSabrina MatàDeborah LecceseMartina SpertiIlaria MartinelliAndrea GhezziJessica MandrioliValentina Virginia IuzzolinoRaffaele DubbiosoFrancesca TrojsiCarla PassanitiGiulia D'AlvanoMassimiliano FilostoAlessandro PadovaniLetizia MazziniFabiola De MarchiLucia ZinnoAndi NurediniPaolo BongioanniCristina DolciottiElena CanaliGiulia ToschiAntonio PetrucciAlessia PernaVittorio RisoMaurizio InghilleriLaura LibonatiChiara CambieriElisabetta PupilloPublished in: Journal of neurology (2023)
ALCAR (Acetyl-L-carnitine) is a donor of acetyl groups and increases the intracellular levels of carnitine, the primary transporter of fatty acids across the mitochondrial membranes. In vivo studies showed that ALCAR decrease oxidative stress markers and pro-inflammatory cytokines. In a previous double-blind placebo-controlled phase II trial showed positive effects on self-sufficiency (defined as a score of 3+ on the ALSFRS-R items for swallowing, cutting food and handling utensils, and walking) ALSFRS-R total score and FVC. We conducted an observational, retrospective, multicentre, case-control study to provide additional data on the effects of ALCAR in subjects with ALS in Italy. Subjects treated with ALCAR 1.5 g/day or 3 g/day were included and matched with not treated subjects by sex, age at diagnosis, site of onset, and time from diagnosis to baseline, (45 subjects per group). ALCAR 3 g/day vs not treated: 22 not treated subjects (48.9%) were still alive at 24 months after baseline, compared to 23 (51.1%) treated subjects (adj. OR 1.18, 95% CI 0.46-3.02). No statistically significant differences were detected in ALSFRS nor FVC nor self-sufficiency. ALCAR 1.5 g/day vs not treated: 22 not treated subjects (48.9%) were still alive at 24 months after baseline, compared to 32 (71.1%) treated subjects (adj. OR 0.27, 95% CI 0.10-0.71). For ALSFRS-R, a mean slope of - 1.0 was observed in treated subjects compared to - 1.4 in those not treated (p = 0.0575). No statistically significant difference was detected in the FVC nor self-sufficiency. Additional evidence should be provided to confirm the efficacy of the drug and provide a rationale for the dosage.
Keyphrases
- oxidative stress
- clinical trial
- double blind
- placebo controlled
- emergency department
- newly diagnosed
- randomized controlled trial
- study protocol
- cross sectional
- squamous cell carcinoma
- radiation therapy
- dna damage
- machine learning
- signaling pathway
- artificial intelligence
- electronic health record
- phase iii
- heat stress
- rectal cancer
- amyotrophic lateral sclerosis
- case control