Neonatal resuscitation: EN-BIRTH multi-country validation study.
Ashish KcKimberly PevenShafiqul AmeenGeorgina MsemoOmkar BasnetHarriet RuysenSojib Bin ZamanMartha MkonyAvinash K SunnyQazi Sadeq-Ur RahmanJosephine ShabaniRam Chandra BastolaEvelyne AssengaNaresh P KcShams El ArifeenEdward KijaHoney MallaStefanie KongNalini SinghalSusan NiermeyerOrnella LincettoLouise T DayJoy E Lawnnull nullPublished in: BMC pregnancy and childbirth (2021)
Population-based surveys are unlikely to be useful for measuring resuscitation coverage given low validity of exit-survey report. Routine labour ward registers have potential to accurately capture BMV as the numerator. Measuring the true denominator for clinical need is complex; newborns may require BMV if breathing ineffectively or experiencing apnoea after initial drying/stimulation or subsequently at any time. Further denominator research is required to evaluate non-crying as a potential alternative in the context of respectful care. Measuring quality gaps, notably timely provision of resuscitation, is crucial for programme improvement and impact, but unlikely to be feasible in routine systems, requiring audits and special studies.
Keyphrases
- cardiac arrest
- cardiopulmonary resuscitation
- septic shock
- palliative care
- clinical practice
- healthcare
- cross sectional
- quality improvement
- gestational age
- affordable care act
- pregnant women
- human health
- randomized controlled trial
- positive airway pressure
- clinical trial
- risk assessment
- obstructive sleep apnea
- health insurance
- case control