Why Percussive Massage Therapy Does Not Improve Recovery after a Water Rescue? A Preliminary Study with Lifeguards.
Alejandra Alonso-CalveteMiguel Lorenzo-MartínezAlexandra Pérez-FerreirósAntonio Couso-BrunoEloy Carracedo-RodríguezMartín Barcala-FurelosRoberto Barcala-FurelosAlexis Padrón-CaboPublished in: Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) (2022)
The aim of this study was to analyze the effects of percussive massage therapy (PMT) on lifeguards' recovery after a water rescue, in comparison with passive recovery. Methods : A quasi-experimental crossover design was conducted to compare passive recovery (PR) and a PMT protocol. A total of 14 volunteer lifeguards performed a simulated 100 m water rescue and perceived fatigue and blood lactate were measured as recovery variables after the rescue and after the 8-min recovery process. Results : There were no differences between PMT and PR in lactate clearance ( p > 0.05), finding in both modalities a small but not significant decrease in blood lactate. In perceived fatigue, both methods decreased this variable significantly ( p < 0.001), with no significant differences between them ( p > 0.05). Conclusions : PMT does not enhance recovery after a water rescue, in comparison with staying passive. Despite PMT appearing to be adequate for recovery in other efforts, it is not recommended for lifeguards' recovery after a water rescue.