Login / Signup

Behavior genetics and randomized controlled trials: A misleading analogy.

Jonathan Michael KaplanKevin Andrew Bird
Published in: The Behavioral and brain sciences (2023)
Madole & Harden argue that just as the results of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) represent gains in causal knowledge and are useful, despite their limitations, so too are the findings of human behavior genetics. We argue that this analogy is misleading. Unlike RCTs, the results of human behavior genetics research cannot suggest efficacious interventions, nor point toward future research.
Keyphrases
  • endothelial cells
  • randomized controlled trial
  • induced pluripotent stem cells
  • healthcare
  • pluripotent stem cells
  • clinical trial
  • systematic review
  • study protocol