Improving health system responses when patients are harmed: a protocol for a multistage mixed-methods study.
Peter Damian HibbertLouise RaggettCharlotte J MolloyJohanna I WestbrookFarah MagrabiVirginia MumfordRobyn Clay-WilliamsRaghu LingamPaul M SalmonSandy MiddletonMike RobertsPatricia BraddSteven BowdenKathleen RyanMark ZackaKirstine Sketcher-BakerAndy PhillipsLanii BirksDinesh K AryaCatherine TrevorrowSuchit HandaGirish SwaminathanAndrew Carson-StevensSiri WiigCarl de WetElizabeth E AustinBrona Nic Giolla EaspaigYing WangGaston ArnoldaGregory Mark PetersonJeffrey BraithwaitePublished in: BMJ open (2024)
Ethics approval has been granted by the Northern Sydney Local Health District Human Research Ethics Committee (2023/ETH02007 and 2023/ETH02341).The research findings will be incorporated into best practice guidance, published in international and national journals and disseminated through conferences.
Keyphrases
- public health
- end stage renal disease
- healthcare
- ejection fraction
- endothelial cells
- newly diagnosed
- chronic kidney disease
- quality improvement
- big data
- primary care
- randomized controlled trial
- peritoneal dialysis
- prognostic factors
- mental health
- south africa
- study protocol
- clinical trial
- patient reported outcomes
- climate change
- pluripotent stem cells
- drug administration