The Covid-19 pandemic in low- and middle-income countries, who carries the burden? Review of mass media and publications from six countries.
Dhia Joseph ChackalackalAhmed Asa'Ad Al-AghbariSu Yeon JangTatiana Rivera RamirezJose VincentAnand JoshiMegha Raj BanjaraPeter AsagaRocio Cardenas SanchezMaria Angelica CarrilloJuan Manuel VillaSonia Diaz MonsalveAxel KroegerPublished in: Pathogens and global health (2021)
During the Covid-19 pandemic, rich countries employed lockdown and physical distancing policies for transmission control. However, the question still remains whether these measures are also suitable in countries with a fragile economy, which rests mainly on the informal sector. The impacts of lockdown measures in disadvantaged population strata in six low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) were reviewed using i) 93 media reports and ii) 17 published scientific papers. This review showed that those who suffered the most from the lockdown were migrants, workers in the large informal sector, small businesses, slum dwellers, women and elderly, revealing the social, cultural and economic inequalities of societies. Financial and food support for the poor was inadequate and sometimes mismanaged. In the better organized societies, the resilience was stronger (South Korea, Kerala/India) but here also the poor had to suffer the most. It is strongly recommended that outbreak response strategies should particularly focus on the poor and vulnerable population.
Keyphrases
- mental health
- healthcare
- public health
- physical activity
- climate change
- polycystic ovary syndrome
- risk factors
- randomized controlled trial
- middle aged
- systematic review
- type diabetes
- emergency department
- pregnancy outcomes
- pregnant women
- social support
- community dwelling
- skeletal muscle
- risk assessment
- depressive symptoms
- health insurance
- affordable care act
- drug induced