The Health Improvement Profile for people with severe mental illness: Feasibility of a secondary analysis to make international comparisons.
Dawn BosRichard John GraySoontareeporn MeepringJacquie WhiteKay FolandDaniel Thomas BressingtonPublished in: Journal of psychiatric and mental health nursing (2021)
WHAT IS ALREADY KNOWN ABOUT THIS TOPIC?: Individuals with severe mental illness (SMI) have elevated risks for physical health problems and low screening rates. No previous studies have compared the physical health promotion needs of people with SMI using the same screening tool across different international settings. WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS TO EXISTING KNOWLEDGE?: It appears feasible to use the HIP to profile and compare physical health-related risks in people with SMI across different international settings. The HIP tool identified significant differences in areas of risk across the four countries. WHAT ARE THE IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE?: The HIP could be used to identify unique clusters of health promotion needs in different countries. Use of HIP health checks may support implementation of individualized interventions. ABSTRACT: Introduction To date, no studies have contrasted physical health profiles of people with severe mental illness (SMI) in different countries. Aim To evaluate feasibility of using the Health Improvement Profile (HIP) to compare and contrast physical health and health behaviours of people with SMI from four countries. Method An observational feasibility study using secondary analysis of pooled health state and lifestyle data. Physical health checks using modified versions of HIP were administered in four countries. Results Findings suggest feasibility of HIP screening to profile and compare physical health and health behaviours of people with SMI across international settings. High overall numbers of risk items (red flags) were identified in all but the Thailand sample. Despite some commonalities, there were important differences in health profiles across countries. Discussion This is the first study to demonstrate feasibility of the HIP to compare health risks in individuals with SMI across countries. Future multi-national HIP studies should recruit a fully powered stratified random sample of people with SMI that is representative of each setting. Implications for practice It appears feasible to utilize the HIP to identify specific areas of health risk in different countries, which may help to better focus nursing interventions and use of resources.
Keyphrases
- mental health
- healthcare
- health promotion
- mental illness
- public health
- physical activity
- health information
- total hip arthroplasty
- randomized controlled trial
- quality improvement
- health risk
- cardiovascular disease
- metabolic syndrome
- early onset
- magnetic resonance
- risk assessment
- type diabetes
- climate change
- cross sectional
- big data
- double blind