Flipped teaching transition to online teaching by STEM educators during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Chaya GopalanCharles SerranoPaige DickeySheyenne DaughrityElizabeth HackmannGeorgia BraceyLynn BartelsJulie FickasSharon LockeCarolyn Butts-WilmsmeyerPublished in: Advances in physiology education (2022)
COVID-19 necessitated online teaching (OT) during the second half of the spring 2020 semester. The perceptions of science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM) faculty of OT at a two-year (2-YI) and a four-year (4-YI) institution were examined during this sudden switchover. One group of educators had received flipped teaching (FT) training (FTEs, n = 23), whereas the other group was practicing traditional teaching (TTEs, n = 18). There were two cohorts of FTEs: cohort 1 were implementing FT for the third time in their classrooms, and cohort 2 had started for the first time. The survey results suggested that FTEs were more confident with OT than TTEs ( P < 0.05). It was interesting to note that 62.5% of the FTEs, whether they were from cohort 1 or cohort 2 , chose an asynchronous approach, whereas 37.5% delivered synchronous OT during the sudden transition. It was found that FT experience helped cohort 1 adjust to OT compared with cohort 2 . Overall, these results suggest that FTEs were confident and their resources for FT eased the transition to OT. NEW & NOTEWORTHY COVID-19 necessitated online teaching (OT). The perceptions of STEM faculty of OT at two-year and four-year institutions were examined. One group had received flipped teaching (FT) training (FTEs), whereas the others practiced traditional teaching (TTEs). Among two cohorts of FTEs, cohort 1 had been practicing FT but not cohort 2 . FTEs were more confident with OT than TTEs. FT experience helped cohort 1 adjust to OT more than cohort 2 . Overall, FT eased the transition to OT.