Login / Signup

Ethical challenges of using remote monitoring technologies for clinical research: A case study of the role of local research ethics committees in the RADAR-AD study.

Marijn MuurlingAnna M G PasmooijIvan KoychevDora RoikLutz FroelichEmilia SchwertnerDorota ReligaCarla AbdelnourMerce BoadaMonica AlmiciSamantha GalluzziSandra CardosoAlexandre de MendonçaAndrew P OwensSajini KuruppuMartha Therese GjestsenIoulietta LazarouMara GkiokaMagda TsolakiAna DiazDianne GovePieter Jelle VisserDag AarslandFederica LuciveroCasper de Boernull null
Published in: PloS one (2023)
The differences in the ethics review process of the same study protocol across different local settings suggest that a multi-site study would benefit from a harmonization in research ethics governance processes. More specifically, some best practices could be included in ethical reviews across institutional and national contexts, such as the opinion of an institutional data protection officer, patient advisory board reviews of the protocol and plans for how ethical reflection is embedded within the study.
Keyphrases
  • public health
  • randomized controlled trial
  • big data
  • healthcare
  • clinical trial
  • decision making
  • case report
  • global health
  • quality improvement