Prophylactic maintenance with venetoclax/azacitidine after reduced-intensity conditioning allogeneic transplant for high-risk MDS and AML.
Jacqueline S GarciaHaesook T KimH Moses MurdockMichela AnsuinelliJennifer BrockCorey S CutlerMahasweta GooptuVincent T HoJohn KorethSarah NikiforowRizwan RomeeRoman ShapiroDaniel J DeAngeloRichard M StoneDenbaa Bat-ErdeneJeremy Adam RyanManuel E ContrerasGeoffrey G FellAnthony LetaiJerome RitzR Coleman LindsleyRobert J SoifferJoseph H AntinPublished in: Blood advances (2024)
We conducted a phase 1 trial assessing safety and efficacy of prophylactic maintenance therapy with venetoclax and azacitidine (Ven/Aza) for patients with high-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS)/acute myeloid leukemia (AML) undergoing reduced intensity allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) after Ven and fludarabine/busulfan conditioning (Ven/FluBu2 allo-SCT) with tacrolimus and methotrexate as graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis. Among 27 patients who underwent Ven/FluBu2 allo-SCT (55.6% with prior Ven exposure, and 96% with positive molecular measurable residual disease), 22 received maintenance therapy with Aza 36 mg/m2 intravenously on days 1 to 5, and Ven 400 mg by mouth on days 1 to 14 per assigned dose schedule/level (42-day cycles × 8, or 28-day cycles × 12). During maintenance, the most common grade 3-4 adverse events were leukopenia, neutropenia, and thrombocytopenia, which were transient and manageable. Infections were uncommon (n = 4, all grade 1-2). The 1-year and 2-year moderate/severe chronic GVHD rates were 4% (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.3%-18%) and 22% (95% CI, 9%-40%), respectively. After a median follow-up of 25 months among survivors, the median overall survival (OS) was not reached. Among the 22 patients who received Ven/Aza maintenance, the 2-year OS, progression-free survival, nonrelapse mortality, and cumulative incidence of relapse rates were 67% (95% CI, 43%-83%), 59% (95% CI, 36%-76%), 0%, and 41% (95% CI, 20%-61%), respectively. Immune monitoring demonstrated no significant impact on T-cell expansion but identified reduced B-cell expansion compared with controls. This study demonstrates prophylactic Ven/Aza maintenance can be safely administered for patients with high-risk MDS/AML, but a randomized study is required to properly assess any potential benefit. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT03613532.
Keyphrases
- acute myeloid leukemia
- stem cell transplantation
- allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation
- free survival
- high dose
- high intensity
- risk factors
- bone marrow
- acute lymphoblastic leukemia
- type diabetes
- cardiovascular disease
- cardiovascular events
- mesenchymal stem cells
- randomized controlled trial
- early onset
- clinical trial
- risk assessment
- drug induced
- subarachnoid hemorrhage
- blood brain barrier
- phase ii
- smoking cessation
- chemotherapy induced
- replacement therapy