Login / Signup

Ethics and Health Communication in English: Tackling the Consequences of Colonial Era Linguicism and Racism.

Saroj Jayasinghe
Published in: Asian bioethics review (2021)
Sri Lanka, once a colony of Britain, gained independence in 1948. However, especially the health sector continues to use English as its main medium of communication. Such language bias leads to marginalization of those less fluent in English, and hinders achieving a higher level of health literacy. Discrimination of people or social groups based on their language is termed linguicism. Tackling linguicism requires an understanding of its historic roots and an exploration of potential links to colonial racial prejudices. Published literature presents evidence that traces linguicism to language policies of the British colonial government (1815-1948). Though an exhaustive survey of historical records is not presented, there is reasonable evidence to suggest a close link. British colonial rule derived its justification from supremacist and racist ideology. As a result, English became the medium in all forms of official communications, a situation that persisted after independence. A similar situation exists in many parts of the worlds. We should recognize language-based discrimination and linguicism as public health issues. They are detrimental to health of vulnerable groups and have the potential to worsen health disparities.
Keyphrases
  • public health
  • healthcare
  • mental health
  • autism spectrum disorder
  • health information
  • systematic review
  • global health
  • human health
  • health promotion
  • machine learning
  • risk assessment
  • cross sectional
  • deep learning