White paper: statement on conflicts of interest.
Julian BionMassimo AntonelliLLuis BlanchJ Randall CurtisChristiane DrumlBin DuFlavia R MachadoCharles GomersallChristiane HartogMitchell LevyJohn MyburghGordon RubenfeldCharles SprungPublished in: Intensive care medicine (2018)
Nationally funded open-access registries should be established to permit complete disclosure of financial, professional, and personal relationships with the potential for driving bias in research, clinical practice, or health management. Governance of disclosure should be the responsibility of employing organisations through annual staff appraisals, audited by national research integrity committees. Research fraud should incur suspension of the license to practice. Organisations should monitor staff perceptions of ethical climate to enhance awareness of staff behaviours and the potential for misconduct driven by academic pressures. Clear separation of advisory and voting roles is needed in best practice guideline panels. Professional societies and scientific journals should display conflict of interest policies for their own staff and officers as well as for speakers and authors. Undergraduates should not be exposed to pharmaceutical promotions masquerading as education. Undergraduate and postgraduate training programmes should include teaching about managing conflicts of interest and identifying research misconduct.
Keyphrases