Login / Signup

Justification of research using systematic reviews continues to be inconsistent in clinical health science-A systematic review and meta-analysis of meta-research studies.

Jane AndreasenBirgitte NørgaardEva DraborgCarsten Bogh JuhlJennifer YostKlara BrunnhuberKaren A RobinsonHans Lund
Published in: PloS one (2022)
Justification of new studies in clinical health research using systematic reviews is highly variable, and fewer than half of new clinical studies in health science were justified using a systematic review. Research redundancy is a challenge for clinical health researchers, as well as for funders, ethics committees, and journals.
Keyphrases
  • public health
  • healthcare
  • systematic review
  • mental health
  • health information
  • randomized controlled trial
  • risk assessment
  • meta analyses
  • machine learning
  • human health
  • social media
  • global health
  • case control